● Ads for beauty & skincare brands

Creative fatigue is the enemy. Outproduce it.

UGC-style creative testing, offer strategy, and retention flows — growth that doesn't die when one ad does.

  • ↗ No long-term contracts.
  • ↗ Senior media buyers only.
  • ↗ Real dashboards, not decks.
Google Ads · Ecommerce results dashboard
Google Ads · Ecommerce1,345% ROAS
$10.8M revenue Accepting new growth partners
Weeklyfresh creative in the account
1,345%peak Google Ads ROAS
$10.8Mrevenue for one scaled brand
Monthlyrolling contract, cancel anytime
The Symptoms

Tell us if this is your feed

Every beauty founder we talk to says at least three of these.

"Our CPMs have nearly doubled since 2023. Our AOV hasn't."

"The 'get ready with me' angle printed money — until every competitor had the same video with the same voiceover."

"We're sitting on 400 pieces of UGC and have no idea which three are actually worth media spend."

"Our before/after ads keep getting rejected, so we run the safe ones. The safe ones don't convert."

"15% off became 20%, became 25%. The discount ladder is doing the selling now and margin is paying for it."

"Repeat rate is our dirty secret. We acquire like a DTC brand and retain like a gas station."

The Real Problem

Why beauty brands burn out

01
Fatigue moves at feed speed

In this category creative dies in days, not months. Without a standing production and testing pipeline, you find out a winner died from the revenue chart — two weeks and five figures too late.

02
Sameness is the real competitor

Everyone runs the same three angles: routine insert, GRWM, influencer holding product at the camera. When your winner works, it gets cloned within weeks. The moat isn't the angle — it's how fast you produce the next one.

03
The discount treadmill

Paid growth built on escalating discounts trains customers to wait for the sale and quietly torches both margin and brand. It feels like growth. It's a leak wearing a growth costume.

The Fix

What we run for beauty brands

Weekly creative batches, distinct angles

Founder story, ingredient mechanism, routine insert, texture and application, social proof — tested as hooks against control, one variable at a time, so we know what actually moved.

Grade the library before spending on it

That pile of UGC gets audited and ranked: hook strength, claim safety, watch-through. Media budget goes to proven assets — not whichever video the group chat liked.

Compliant before/after frameworks

There are ways to show transformation that pass review — framing, timelines, disclaimers, angle choice. We build those instead of resubmitting rejected ads and hoping.

Offer architecture over deeper discounts

Bundles, routines, and sets that raise AOV — so the offer gets more compelling while the margin gets healthier. The opposite of the discount ladder.

Replenishment-timed retention

Flows timed to when the product actually runs out — a 30-day serum gets a different rhythm than a 90-day supplement. Repeat purchase is where beauty economics finally work.

Landing pages matched to each angle

The ingredient-story ad lands on an ingredient page, not a generic PDP. Message match is the cheapest conversion lift there is, and almost nobody in this category does it.

Proof

Real Accounts. Real Dashboards.

We don't sell promises. We show proof.

Google Ads · Ecommerce results dashboard
Google Ads · Ecommerce1,345% ROAS

$10.8M revenue — scaled without destroying profitability

Snapchat + Bing results dashboard
Snapchat + Bing4,570% ROAS

$4.8M from Snapchat — where beauty CPMs are still cheap

FAQ

Questions We Get On Every Call.

Perfect — then production cost drops and testing speed doubles. What we add is the layer most content teams don't have: briefs built from performance data, a ranked audit of what's media-worthy versus social-worthy (they're different skills), and a testing structure that turns your library into decisions instead of a folder.
No — you change how it's framed. Straight side-by-side transformation claims trip policy in beauty and skincare, but timeline formats, texture demos, and testimonial structures carry the same proof with far lower rejection rates. It's a solved problem; it just isn't solved by resubmitting the same ad.
Offer architecture. A bundle at full margin routinely beats 20% off on conversion because it raises perceived value instead of cutting price — and it lifts AOV at the same time, which quietly raises how much you can afford to pay for every customer. We test offers with the same discipline as creative. Discounting is the last lever, not the first.
A flat monthly retainer per platform, quoted on your strategy call. No percentage-of-spend surprises, no setup fees buried in month three. Creative and landing pages are included.
Most of our clients spend $6,000+/month per platform. Below that, ad platforms can't gather enough data to optimize properly. If your budget isn't there yet, we'll tell you on the call and point you to what to fix first.
No. Everything is month to month. We keep clients by performing, not by paperwork.
Ready To Talk?

Your next winner
should already be in testing.

Bring your ad account and your content library. In 30 minutes we'll tell you which assets deserve budget, which angles are fatigued, and what the testing calendar for your next 60 days looks like.

Book My Free Strategy Session